Submit Abortion simply isn't about Women's rights. I don't understand how someone could even BEGIN to try and justify killing a child by coining the phrase, "my body, my choice. Since when do women have four arms, four legs, two heads, two functioning brains, and two bearing hearts?
I believe that abortion should be illegal except for when the pregnancy poses an abnormal threat to the life of the mother. Men are not the one that has carry the child throughout the 9 months of pregnancy and give birth to it.
I doubt most women would want to be reminded of their assault through their innocent child. Report this Argument Con Abortion, despite how it may seem, is not a complicated issue. Either the fetus is alive, and thus is a human life. The combination of 23 chromosomes present in each pronucleus results in 46 chromosomes in the zygote.
Thus the diploid number is restored and the embryonic genome is formed. The embryo now exists as a genetic unity. Furthermore, even if you deny the humanity of the fetus, you are still dealing with a potential human life which should be held in higher moral regard than the convenience of the mother or father.
Another argument that many of those on the pro-choice side of the argument is that women have the human right to control their bodies. And I am in complete agreement.
However, the human fetus is not your body. It is IN your body. I hold that the time to control your body would have been before conception IE: Moral argument number 3. I look forward to a rational and well thought out debate and wish my opponent the best of luck. I eagerly await your response.
First, my opponent states that it is the mothers choice to kill her baby. No one gets to make that choice.
For these reasons and innumerable others, I ask for you all to vote con.Trapping women in their bodies through legislation, metaphorically tying them down so they can’t cause an abortion themselves, is horrific, something out of a dystopian novel.
Because no matter what you will have women dying against their wills, refused their right to determine what another person is doing to their body, and to do so with privacy and the same rights everyone else enjoys in any other circumstance, except for you I guess, when there is a fetus.
Adoption is not an alternative to abortion because it remains the woman's choice whether or not to give her child up for adoption. Statistics show that very few women who give birth choose to give up their babies; less than 3 percent of white unmarried women and less than 2 percent of percent black unmarried women.
who have an abortion do. Another argument that many of those on the pro-choice side of the argument is that women have the human right to control their bodies. And I am in complete agreement.
When it is your body that you are doing something to then you should have every right to do so insofar as it's not self-harm. Yes because women have to right to there body so if they don't want to have a child then they should have to right to have an abortion. I I I I say this because there could be a good reason why they can't have .
Some Native women have critiqued these terms as not Defenders of the proposed criteria may respond that the reversibly comatose do satisfy the relevant criteria because they "retain all their against the unborn. According to this argument, those who deny that fetuses have a right to life do not value all.