Moral paradox of right and wrong through technology

Consequentialism Because deontological theories are best understood in contrast to consequentialist ones, a brief look at consequentialism and a survey of the problems with it that motivate its deontological opponents, provides a helpful prelude to taking up deontological theories themselves. Some consequentialists are monists about the Good. Other consequentialists are pluralists regarding the Good. Some of such pluralists believe that how the Good is distributed among persons or all sentient beings is itself partly constitutive of the Good, whereas conventional utilitarians merely add or average each person's share of the Good to achieve the Good's maximization.

Moral paradox of right and wrong through technology

Recommended Reading

Morality Without God Pages: In the end, through Frankenstein, Shelley concludes that moral and spiritual development can best be attained through the shedding of dogmatic belief structures, resulting in the elimination of God towards the attainment of self-realization.

Strangely, although the secular theme is continued throughout the text, the religious references and biblical allusions cannot be ignored and are a complex addition to a text that could otherwise be viewed as a secular treatise on the dangerous nature of knowledge.


Although it would be simple to pare the text down to such non-religious terms, it cannot be ignored that Frankenstein contains a great deal of biblical symbolism, particularly the theme of the outcast and the story of creation. One difference, though, makes the monster a sympathetic character, especially to contemporary readers.

In the biblical story, Adam causes his own fate by sinning.

Ethics and Morality: Right and Wrong

Only after he is repeatedly rejected does the creature become violent and decide to seek revenge" Mellor Despite the lack of cultivation and learning in the morals and ethics of Christianity, the monster in Frankenstein.Check Your Understandings Two 4 Cloning is morally wrong and inhumane.

For humans to consider the cloning of one another, forces every one of us to question the very concepts of right and wrong that makes us all human.

Moral paradox of right and wrong through technology

The cloning of any species whether . Moral: 1 a: of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior: ethical ²moral judgments³ b: expressing or teaching a conception of right behavior ²a moral poem³ c: conforming to a standard of right behavior [2].


The Paradox of Technology: What’s Right now, learning about the cultural non-neutrality of technolo-gy is a peripheral area of study, if it is studied at all.

This, despite the pass on their moral norms through narrative and . It turns out that most of our common sense ideas about technology are wrong. This is although I use the word loosely here to refer to the counter-intuitive nature of much of what we know about technology.

Some Questions About Moral Paradoxes 1 : Ethics Etc The phrase 21st century is already a yawn, perhaps because all the hype has dulled our senses.
A New Atlantis? Under deontology, an act may be considered right even if the act produces a bad consequence, [35] if it follows the rule or moral law. According to the deontological view, people have a duty to act in a way that does those things that are inherently good as acts "truth-telling" for exampleor follow an objectively obligatory rule as in rule utilitarianism.
Ethics and Morality: Advancing Toward the Moral Brink He says we are like men adrift at sea without a compass.

1. The paradox of the parts and the whole.

Information Technology and Moral Values (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Ten Paradoxes of Technology/6. Provide an example of technology that illustrates the moral paradox of both right and wrong%(1). ‚RIGHT™ VERSUS ‚WRONG™ AND ‚RIGHT™ VERSUS ‚RIGHT™: ethicists require the values and functions of an institution be determined through ongoing discussion because these values are multiple, complex, competing and changeable.

they know to be right, they need ethical and moral frameworks to guide their practice™. 5.

Analysis of “Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley : Morality Without God